From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 22:46:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C956A16A41F for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:46:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F409C43D45 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:46:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2005 22:46:24 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 00:46:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:46:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 X-Birthday: Oct. 6th 1972 X-CelPhone: +49 (0) 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 (0) 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1899224.9Pxz8LrGEq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200508310046.20808@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: GbE NICs besides em (recommendation wanted) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:46:26 -0000 --nextPart1899224.9Pxz8LrGEq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other=20 GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only). AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't saturate a PIII@800= =20 at 200mbit/s with interrupt load (like em does)? I heard that the re is way better than the not so well rl and although much= =20 cheaper than em more efficient. What about bge? Or sk? Any comments welcome, also if I missed a supported=20 family (TX only) Thanks, =2DHarry --nextPart1899224.9Pxz8LrGEq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDFOG8Bylq0S4AzzwRArSOAJsEXt+IXHoGozK2bDmy5Di6CAOx6gCcDCF3 EwVOvA+uWIgccPfAI9BOB0Q= =m+TE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1899224.9Pxz8LrGEq--