From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jul 15 21:08:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA28796 for security-outgoing; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 21:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kechara.flame.org (kechara.flame.org [192.80.44.209]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA28753; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 21:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zhaneel.flame.org (zhaneel.flame.org [192.80.44.210]) by kechara.flame.org (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA08373; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 00:07:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from explorer@localhost) by zhaneel.flame.org (8.7.5/8.6.9) id AAA00281; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 00:07:26 -0400 (EDT) To: Brian Tao Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , FREEBSD-SECURITY-L Subject: Re: suidness of /usr/bin/login References: From: Michael Graff Date: 16 Jul 1996 00:07:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Brian Tao's message of Mon, 15 Jul 1996 22:36:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.33/Emacs 19.31 Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Brian Tao writes: > Does /usr/bin/login need to be setuid root? Since it is normally > only called by telnetd (which already runs as root), does it have to > be setuid root as well? What else uses it? xterm (which itself is > also setuid root)? Users? you can always use ``login foo'' and that is supposed to let someone else log in, kinda in mid session and all. --Michael