From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Mon Apr 18 21:43:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AE3B139B5; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54B1B1E99; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1asGwm-0009Y7-Gp; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:43:08 +0300 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:43:08 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Sean Fagan Cc: lev@FreeBSD.org, Glen Barber , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160418214308.GC6614@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org> <57152CE5.5050500@FreeBSD.org> <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:43:09 -0000 On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:01:46PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote: > On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > > > I understand, that maybe it is too late, but ARE YOU KIDDING?! 755 > > packages?! WHY?! What are reasons and goals to split base in such > > enormous number of packages? > > Just a guess, having done the same thing myself: it means that updates can be > more targeted. Realy? I am now try to upgrade test VM from CFT version (from /project) to current. Upgraded only 407 packages. All -lib32- packages don't upgraded. OK, how I do debug this? What system state I am have now? What hapened? What I need to do?