From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 15 15:41:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A34106566B for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krassi@bulinfo.net) Received: from mx.bulinfo.net (mx.bulinfo.net [193.194.156.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABDB8FC1F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krassi@bulinfo.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.bulinfo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DE5C794; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:41:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mx.bulinfo.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx.bulinfo.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11164-03; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:41:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.2.188] (pythia.bulinfo.net [212.72.195.5]) by mx.bulinfo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF1EC31D; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:41:15 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4A5DF89A.1070004@bulinfo.net> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:41:14 +0300 From: Krassimir Slavchev User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090225) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Petter Selasky References: <4A5C3BF5.9030200@bulinfo.net> <200907151353.21403.hselasky@c2i.net> <4A5DD842.3080007@bulinfo.net> <200907151532.03875.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <200907151532.03875.hselasky@c2i.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.bulinfo.net Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ohci not detected on at91rm9200? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:41:18 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 15:23:14 Krassimir Slavchev wrote: >> Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>>> It is detected but after configuring the interface I cannot send/receive > >>> You need to "ifconfig up" the interface on both sides before any traffic >>> will pass. >> Of course they are: >> >> cdce0: >> flags=108c43 >> metric 0 mtu 1500 >> ether 2a:00:00:00:00:00 >> inet 192.168.2.121 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 >> media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP >> status: active >> >> ate0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=8 >> ether 43:00:00:01:ff:00 >> inet 192.168.2.189 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active > > You should have cdce devices on both sides, PC and Host. Looks like there will > be a network conflict if you use 192.168.2.xx for both network devices when > they are not on the same cable. > > ? Yes, I realize that. After adding cdce on arm board: cdce0: on usbus0 ue0: on cdce0 ue0: Ethernet address: 2a:23:45:67:89:54 ue0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 2a:23:45:67:89:54 But on the other side running 7.2: cdce0: on uhub4 cdce0: setting alternate interface failed device_attach: cdce0 attach returned 6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKXfiaxJBWvpalMpkRAi6fAJwMzhfBcwNouW4Y7iPFFHl9PjiUTQCcCSzB hlRr1q6cBUpGcGXjgm9/wh8= =bXm9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----