From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 14 17:34:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F09EFDC for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:34:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714E0A5E for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id j1so3809960oag.21 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=W8NIUOJfg1Vd8yByUQ4oQzVN+tp3rJ2oj4+ls+4wDsU=; b=Qd2MJRuMZG/dlM8PpKcxElc8Je0dyfiyC6Urn+oMOE9681GQA1N7OiIMwgBM0vEZat Q9j5pavc9L/Dxi4F/BZTdj/uHpjws9NV+xmF2Gd+0apJFengun5vp3YMPGeH3XvMWb/B TPBPd2pJnkPblrl+ugpah1lOomJMRPqVvtdIQsJTV8C+GosG3w2YMRXGgjyYqbbXDUVl 9uQrxuY0Qqr4Lqf/2nkihR5TnV61TaBpPyFyBWkHUndH0Wl7vkOvftxwsTEZxMQ3yoUy 3Qs414/ZPqJZNoJi8rVs01v/9J7LrAK8iLt4bbpg5jo5v+6ul+pm6Ip8gBOfcZM5f8aw XFxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.125.200 with SMTP id ms8mr2278829obb.67.1365960846244; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.140.229 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130415015850.Y56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20130415015850.Y56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:34:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problems with ipfw/natd and axe(4) From: Michael Sierchio To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9+xagT1vml+DLT39q29iJ9GKCQbMJQdiaQmcjXXWC4lI/l2WHs+NKDV7IQUekC1qZOrKM X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:34:12 -0000 On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > 'allow ip' aka 'allow all' doesn't usually take a port number, which > applies only to tcp and udp. It does in ipfw - in which case it means ( udp | tcp )