From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 27 18:57:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C9D16A402 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A1743D46 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:57:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3RIvNm4002783; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:57:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k3RIvMNI002782; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:57:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:57:22 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Mike Jakubik Message-ID: <20060427185722.GA2741@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20060425090739.8470143f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <005301c668ab$39c4c150$8b00a8c0@multiplay.co.uk> <444E8F8A.9030409@rogers.com> <17487.34074.833134.823847@canoe.dclg.ca> <444F8912.4010604@rogers.com> <00bd01c66946$6ce6f3a0$b5db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <444FA32F.2060209@rogers.com> <20060427032037.GA86693@dragon.NUXI.org> <44503AC6.3060609@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44503AC6.3060609@rogers.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland , Bill Moran , David Gilbert Subject: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:57:29 -0000 On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:30:14PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > > >>Steven Hartland wrote: > >> > >>>IIRC AM2 is not a server solution just a client one the new server > >>>socket is significantly different. > >>> > >>Its not a server/desktop thing, its a new socket that will allow AMD to > >>use DDR2 memory. It applies to both Athlons and Opterons. > > > >No! Socket AM2 is the DDR2 939-pin Athlon64 desktop replacement. > >Socket F(1207) is DDR2 the 940-pin Opteron server replacement. > > Same crap, different pins. The change simply allows AMD cpus to use DDR2 > memory, nothing more. What does that mean? "Same Crap"? I was giving accurate and correct names of the sockets and that there are two different Opteron rev.F sockets. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?