From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 28 15: 6: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E5537B409 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA15453; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:05:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA29367; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:05:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15284.62532.646632.721076@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:05:56 -0600 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost In-Reply-To: <20010928141246.A15515@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010928141246.A15515@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.95 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Just a note to those who have updated to 4.4-STABLE that it's well > worth doing a backup + newfs + restore on all your UFS volumes. Umm, I was under the impression that the dirpref changes didn't require any modifications to the FS. Do we have to create new filesystems for this to be effective? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message