From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 12:40:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC5E16A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:40:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bloodwood.hunterlink.net.au (smtp-local.hunterlink.net.au [203.12.144.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A839143D53 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:40:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from ppp21B2.dyn.pacific.net.au (ppp21B2.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.33.178])j1JCeiOB001150 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:40:45 +1100 From: Sam Lawrance To: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1108810454.670.35.camel@dirk.no.domain> References: <1108810454.670.35.camel@dirk.no.domain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:41:51 +1100 Message-Id: <1108816911.670.42.camel@dirk.no.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Update or remove X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:40:47 -0000 In my trawl through unmaintained port fetch errors, I'm coming across more and more libraries in a similar state - old, unfetchable, and unused by the rest of the tree. General guidance appreciated. I think it's better to nuke them and save the maintenance effort for other stuff. Should I just rack up a list and post them here later?