From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 16 07:35:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA01771 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 07:35:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from seagull.rtd.com (seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA01766 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 07:35:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA03972; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 08:34:27 -0700 (MST) From: Don Yuniskis Message-Id: <199703161534.IAA03972@seagull.rtd.com> Subject: Re: wd driver questions To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 08:34:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <19970316113225.PM45611@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Mar 16, 97 11:32:25 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Could someone with more intimate knowledge of that driver spare > > a few moments for a quick set of questions? > > That's not me :-), but wdgetctlr() seems to be the function to look > at. Heh heh heh... your fingers must be exhausted from answering all my questions, eh Joerg? :> Actually, the problem seems to be in how the probe interprets the results of the IDENTIFY command. As such, it is possible for the drive to currently be INITed to one particular geometry yet have the probe report an entirely different geometry (as I had described in my email). Of course, I know just enough about this stuff to be considered dangerous so I will have to tread carefully before recommending a patch... As always, thanks! --don