From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 13:00:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796031065670 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A6B8FC19 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jgg67-0000lZ-3W for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:00:19 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:00:19 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:00:19 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:00:05 +0200 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <763154.59087.qm@web54302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20080331172552.313e8d49@bhuda.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig68A2ECC2294B67B4C7FF3644" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <20080331172552.313e8d49@bhuda.mired.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Feature request X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:00:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig68A2ECC2294B67B4C7FF3644 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Why OpenLDAP? Why not one of the other ldap implementations available > in the ports? In particular, do any of them already have plugins for > use with pam? What are the other LDAP implementations in ports? Especially the ones that are actively maintained (which excludes tinyldap)? Any compliant LDAP server with proper schemas will "support" PAM. --------------enig68A2ECC2294B67B4C7FF3644 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH8jHbldnAQVacBcgRAtbWAKCLn1tvLRfH1ToEqDCps32Ad4aRUwCg4k6G vvgudy9qxYqeAyEvyfB8uFQ= =ym+Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig68A2ECC2294B67B4C7FF3644--