From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Mar 10 2: 0:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FCB37B416 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 02:00:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020310100012.QFTN2951.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 10:00:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA57482; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 01:55:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 01:55:17 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Garance A Drosihn , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Increasing the size of dev_t and ino_t In-Reply-To: <35227.1015748218@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I mean, not as a static permanent thing as it is now teh new dev_t will be meaningful only in the short term and need not be expanded. On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Ju > lian Elischer writes: > > >dev_t will not exist in 6.0 > > It's standards mandated. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message