From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 12:12:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FD416A4CE for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.park7.number.ru (host212-5-99-220.izmaylovo.ru [212.5.99.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A0443D45 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:12:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blacksir@number.ru) Received: from blacksir.local ([192.168.2.166] helo=blacksir) by mail.park7.number.ru with smtp (Exim 4.30 #0 (Slackware)) id 1ApCKN-000Gej-1L; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:11:51 +0300 From: "Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir" To: "Jack L. Stone" , "Luigi Rizzo" , "Don Bowman" Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 23:10:25 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Syntax to block 38 IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:12:14 -0000 Mmmm.... of course 2. ipfw deny ip from 209.102.202.0/24 to any ipfw deny ip from 65.194.51.0/24 to any or 2. ipfw deny ip from 209.102.202.0/24 to me ipfw deny ip from 65.194.51.0/24 to me > > A follow-up question is that, if I do upgrade, will IPFW2 still > use my old > > rules until I can get around to tuning/tweaking...?? In my case(i using ipfw rules to count traffic from our clients. small ISP company) - everything works perfect after upgrade ipfw1->ipfw2 with the same ruleset.