From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 12 12:20: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868B137B503 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA38529; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:20:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010121920.MAA38529@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: arpwatch@ee.lbl.gov Subject: Re: ports/19047: net/arpwatch patched to use tmpfile() instead of mk Reply-To: arpwatch@ee.lbl.gov Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/19047; it has been noted by GNATS. From: arpwatch@ee.lbl.gov To: mi@privatelabs.com, Maxim Sobolev Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, arpwatch@ee.lbl.gov Subject: Re: ports/19047: net/arpwatch patched to use tmpfile() instead of mk Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:10:48 PDT It looks like this bug report has already been closed out but I thought I'd let everyone know that the latest release of arpwatch: ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/arpwatch.tar.gz uses mkstemp(). Craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message