Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:21:53 -0700 From: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? Message-ID: <5005AD41.6020406@jetcafe.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207170745170.9428@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF4BEED.10103@FreeBSD.org> <62039A45-92E4-4588-988D-6DF39D7B01E5@bsdimp.com> <201207050922.25815.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <20120705082857.GB37083@server.rulingia.com> <4FF55864.8040807@FreeBSD.org> <50048A96.5060803@jetcafe.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207170745170.9428@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/16/12 22:45, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> Why not create a command wtf(1)? >> > there are really lot of good features that can be made in FreeBSD. > actually good, instead of that crap Unless you have some objective, measurable, and quantifiable definition of "crap", your judgement is a subjective one and I am unable to evaluate whether I am for or against it. I find that it's a real problem finding good features in FreeBSD, especially if they are new. I don't have so much time to track mailing lists and pour over the source code (usually the single source of documentation on new features), so I would find a command that suggested new features and pointed the user to related documentation extremely useful. I'm sure there are many others who would agree. :) Would you explain why you do not? -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>>> *The opinions expressed above are entirely my own* <<<< The difference between a moral man and a man of honor is that the latter regrets a discreditable act, even when it has worked and he has not been caught.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5005AD41.6020406>