From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 18 14:37:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60C616A41C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanco@satro.sk) Received: from mail.satronet.sk (mail.satronet.sk [217.144.16.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB1343D53 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:37:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanco@satro.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.satronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E159A160543FE for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:37:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.satronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01523-01 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.satronet.sk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.satronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6050316051D33 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 147.175.8.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mvanco) by webmail.satronet.sk with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:37:41 +0200 (CEST) From: "Michal Vanco" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by ANTIvirus at satronet.sk Subject: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:37:46 -0000 Hi, i discovered that routes are not deleted from routing table after link on interface goes down. For example: > netstat -rnf inet | grep bge0 default 10.1.14.1 UGS 0 135968 bge0 10.1/17 link#1 UC 0 0 bge0 > route -n monitor got message of size 96 on Sat Jun 18 15:10:38 2005 RTM_IFINFO: iface status change: len 96, if# 1, link: down, +flags: > netstat -rnf inet | grep bge0 default 10.1.14.1 UGS 0 136011 bge0 10.1/17 link#1 UC 0 0 bge0 Should't all routes via bge0 be deleted after link on bge0 goes down? thanks michal