From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 29 00:20:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA27441 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu (riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.164]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA27392 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dwhite@localhost) by riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id AAA14169; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:23:16 -0700 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:23:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu To: Michael Smith cc: James Raynard , msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, candy@fct.kgc.co.jp, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO binary compatibility? In-Reply-To: <199604280704.QAA10700@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, Michael Smith wrote: > James Raynard stands accused of saying: > > > > >>>>> Michael Smith writes: > > > > > > Yes, "options COMPAT_IBCS2", kernel rebuild. > > > > Are you sure about that? I don't seem to have that in any of my kernel > > config files (not even LINT). Then again, I've never tried to run any > > SCO binaries... > > Yes, very. You see, I _have_ run SCO binaries. And I checked the kernel > configs on a machine that was at that very moment running a SCO binary, > just to be sure 8) This is a 2.1-R machine? In this case the iBCS2 compatibility options are VERY POORLY defined. To the point that we need to add it to LINT and make an appropriate note in sysconfig. (and Linux while we're at it) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major