Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 06 Feb 2021 23:58:19 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 244470] /sbin/dump crashes on larger filesystem
Message-ID:  <bug-244470-227-Gaaj4CPHO6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-244470-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-244470-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244470

bitbucket63-it@yahoo.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bitbucket63-it@yahoo.com

--- Comment #7 from bitbucket63-it@yahoo.com ---
This happened to me as well after I added a bunch of large files.

I went searching for answers and eventually noticed that the assertion in
question in traverse.c was different than the other assertions implemented =
as
part of bug #228807, comment #5 implemented in base r334969. Specifically it
tested for "<" TP_NINDIR instead of "<=3D" TP_NINDIR where other asserts
implemented a <=3D test.

On my file system "spcl.c_count + blks" reached exactly 512 at the point of
failure, which is the value of TP_NINDIR. Perhaps the assert should have te=
sted
for <=3D rather than <.=20

I changed the line in traverse.c and now dump seems to be working again on =
the
file system with lots of indirect inodes. I've uploaded a diff.

FYI, I'm the equivalent of a passenger trying to land the plane after the
flight crew passes out, so YMMV.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-244470-227-Gaaj4CPHO6>