From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 15:12:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C72E16A4CF; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:12:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from Bastion.VanValzah.Com (Bastion.VanValzah.Com [64.81.228.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D82A43D2D; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:12:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Bob@VanValzah.Com) Received: from Relent.VanValzah.Com (Relent.VanValzah.Com [10.168.60.2]) i2INCqdv097983; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:12:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from Bob@VanValzah.Com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])i2INCod3067151; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:12:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from Bob@VanValzah.Com) From: Bob Van Valzah To: Java@FreeBSD.Org, Ports@FreeBSD.Org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1079651570.78067.31.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:12:50 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Why No jsvc Jakarta Commons Daemon Port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:12:54 -0000 It strikes me as odd that I can't find a FreeBSD port of the Jakarta Commons Daemon for use with Tomcat. I need to do virtual hosting for several web sites with Tomcat, so operation on port 80 is a must. Running Tomcat as root is not an option from a security point of view. Port forwarding with with IPFIREWALL is not an option because I don't want to muck with the firewall every time a site comes or goes. I've played with mod_jk and mod_jk2, but it's been a struggle to configure them and they didn't fare well under some load testing I did. So it seems like the commons daemon is the obvious choice for me. I know that the daemon source is installed as part of the Tomcat5 port, but it's been a struggle to get it running and I'm not there yet. Are my requirements and/or experiences that unusual? Advice appreciated. I may submit a port if there's interest from others and no good alternative. Thanks, Bob