From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 7 9:24:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BF837B6CE for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09236; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:24:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA27951; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:24:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200004071624.JAA27951@vashon.polstra.com> To: ak03@gte.com Subject: Re: Overwhelming messages from /sys/netinet/if_ether.c In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: > The message in question can be extremely useful in case there is IP address > clash on the local network. I suggest we just change the code in question to > ignore clashes over 0.0.0.0 address only. I agree. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message