From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 30 19:17:36 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF54D16A418;
	Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cmail.optima.ua (cmail.optima.ua [195.248.191.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F9813C480;
	Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@FreeBSD.org)
X-Spam-Flag: SKIP
X-Spam-Yversion: Spamooborona 1.7.0
Received: from [212.86.226.226] (account mav@alkar.net HELO [192.168.3.2])
	by cmail.optima.ua (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10)
	with ESMTPA id 34522168; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:17:35 +0300
Message-ID: <46FFF64B.3030700@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:17:31 +0300
From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
References: <46FFD850.1040508@FreeBSD.org>
	<20070930182427.GY53439@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070930182427.GY53439@elvis.mu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Kernel thread stack usage
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:17:37 -0000

Alfred Perlstein ?????:
> Not that I know of, but one could defer to queueing once the chain
> gets to a certain length.

It will not be accurate as different nodes have different stack usage 
and also stack partially used (part may be significant) before packet 
entered netgraph.

-- 
Alexander Motin