From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 27 09:14:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76BD106566C for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C418FC15 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1NlIlE-000B4U-Fz; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:14:56 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= In-reply-to: <20100227095702.ffa01da8.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> References: <4B86F384.3010308@digiware.nl> <2a41acea1002251459v40e8c6ddxd0437decbada4594@mail.gmail.com> <4B8795B1.4020006@digiware.nl> <20100226120339.GB17798@icarus.home.lan> <20100226133138.d47dd080.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20100226134429.041ea6f2.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20100226141754.86ae5a3f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20100226174021.8feadad9.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20100226224320.8c4259bf.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <4B884757.9040001@digiware.nl> <20100227080928.e49cb82c.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20100227095702.ffa01da8.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> Comments: In-reply-to Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= message dated "Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:57:02 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:14:56 +0200 From: Daniel Braniss Message-ID: Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Willem Jan Withagen , Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:14:58 -0000 > On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:24:10 +0200 Daniel Braniss > wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? : > > DB> I doubt it, but here is another shot: > DB> are we all running samba? I'm asking because the lock manager keeps > DB> dying and ... > > Nope, no samba on my side. I am running lockd and statd on the server, but > stoppeing them does not change anything. All clients are using option > nolock anyway. > it was a shot in the dark. anyways, I am running tests on an 'unused' server, only me using it to 'make world' and it's leaking. cheers, danny