From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 31 08:12:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85198FD2B30 for ; Thu, 31 May 2018 08:12:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Received: from mail.bsd4all.net (mail.bsd4all.net [144.76.30.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.bsd4all.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2637B7779F for ; Thu, 31 May 2018 08:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 10:12:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87wovkmefe.wl-herbert@gojira.at> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'no route to host" for cloned lo1 iface 12.0-CURRENT r334376+56a973815425(master) amd64 In-Reply-To: References: <876034evol.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <201805302148.w4ULmsq4073733@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.0 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 08:12:40 -0000 On Wed, 30 May 2018 23:53:42 +0200, "K. Macy" wrote: > > Could you please try 334117 vs 334118 and see if 334118 introduces > this regression? I see this behaviour already on r333978 on arm64 (Raspberry PI3). -- Herbert