From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 18 09:25:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA24826 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 09:25:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA24796 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 09:24:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA13957; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 09:24:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199801181724.JAA13957@austin.polstra.com> To: Amancio Hasty cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dladdr hax In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 17 Jan 1998 22:04:24 PST." <199801180604.WAA00766@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 09:24:53 -0800 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Thats an interesting approach so what happens to a vnode of a > running executable when is mark for delete? I kind doubt that the > vnode goes away while the image is still executing 8) Of course not. But there is no longer a pathname for it. John