Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 23:17:43 +0530 From: Manish Jain <bourne.identity@hotmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freeb >> User Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is there any plan to adopt devtmpfs ? Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP1649B848E91E01B70DC631AF61A0@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmoksoT8-f0YTGi249An0ZhBrZO25XhnXXbCBNXHBLA4CWA@mail.gmail.com> References: <BLU436-SMTP37B91369BA1F4532599758F61F0@phx.gbl> <CAJ-VmoksoT8-f0YTGi249An0ZhBrZO25XhnXXbCBNXHBLA4CWA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/05/2015 22:30, Adrian Chadd wrote: > It's not devtmpfs - it's likely some USB bugs that haven't been nailed down. > > can you gather some debugging output (dmesg > file.txt would be a good > start) and email that to freebsd-usb@freebsd.org ? It may be something > that's been fixed since 10.1 was released. > > Thanks! > > > > -adrian > It does not work. I tried adding all clauses/lines to /etc/hosts, but still X would refuse to come up if the name ends with .domain.super_domain (specifically roundabouttech.com) I have opted for QMail, specifically hoping that hostname is not a problem and, more importantly, that it seems to have better documentation available than even for the inbuilt sendmail system. Even QMail documentation is not exactly state-of-the-art, but it seems adaptable. Thanks Manish jain
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BLU436-SMTP1649B848E91E01B70DC631AF61A0>