From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 11 12:14:05 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA16291 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 12:14:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [165.254.13.209]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA16284 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 12:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from dialup-110.cdmo.com (dialup-110.cdmo.com [204.141.95.167]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA00249; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 15:12:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 15:12:29 -0500 Message-Id: <199601112012.PAA00249@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Terry Lambert From: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Subject: Re: pppd vs ijppp Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Terry Lambert writes.... >To put it in a single aphorism: anything that works is better than >anything that doesn't. You may recognize this as a reformulation of >Occam's Razor, the guiding principle of "The Scientific Method". Of course, the truly arrogant believe that they can make ANYTHING work....so the question bouces back to which is the best way to do it. db ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25