From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 09:10:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D6116A41A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sugarfreemonkey@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191C913C45A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sugarfreemonkey@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so862647nfb for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 02:10:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nqkwZ9qzQ9cGsKXzJVx6VJ1Cm7crjU3wCxdKXGheIaa06KA6LzjboViU0ZyEZ/L2Sp/ciEPGT8bJjT1PemxutaxgSQ5g/Py2gQ0IWYwDmYn/Nk4pb1AxPo+spZnjY7OyVVXJHOBaEkFSUVUxVjLsRXZHEOGP7dbyhI6iTC4AsA8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qZVZ5DtSW1rjoULTuFCh7/dssypKhFbLnCSWaiuoS89AHgQLqucRzixDvL0ZBkQwsm9RIGZeWVEdGSl/Ch+zZsM9Pd7T9UBUgLoUW53gXuhuC9dQqmT+0tVGRgsx7n+OMNCAUBikCFKrbnG+Kx7TF+E0mBbqTiSvhxbl3kAIAU8= Received: by 10.78.201.10 with SMTP id y10mr91176huf.1187169048496; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 02:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.171.12 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 02:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1fc8a2a60708150210i73f8cb9evd60747bc3fb314e3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:10:48 +0800 From: "Nex Mon" To: "Roman Divacky" In-Reply-To: <20070815082857.GA59064@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1fc8a2a60708142327p3f9ff079l345d47f9ceb6f489@mail.gmail.com> <20070815082857.GA59064@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: questions on nonsleepable lock X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:10:50 -0000 thanks for your reply. i didn't use WITNESS. it is disabled. is their a list a list of which locks are sleepable and non-sleepable in FreeBSD6.2? is sleeping triggered by a call to "sleep", IO operation or a result of context switching by kernel? thanks On 8/15/07, Roman Divacky wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:27:56PM +0800, Nex Mon wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > Can someone point me out or explain the technical details of this kernel > > panic: > > > > sleeping thread (tid 100093, pid 2676) owns nonsleepable lock > > panic: sleeping thread > > it just says that some thread owns a nonsleepable lock and went sleeping. > are you using WITNESS? >