From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 25 05:53:15 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA24993 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 05:53:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from itsdsv1.enc.edu (itsdsv1.enc.edu [199.93.252.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA24988 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 05:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from owensc@localhost) by itsdsv1.enc.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id IAA00764; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 08:50:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 08:50:43 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Owens To: David Langford , David Langford cc: wollman@lcs.mit.edu, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Keeping multiple servers at -stable In-Reply-To: <199603212239.MAA06745@caliban.dihelix.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 21 Mar 1996, David Langford wrote: > > The other way would be to mount your targets on your source machine > > and do a "make DESTDIR=/mount/target_machine SHARED=copies hierarchy install" > > This way all your /usr/share/mk files and programs can be in sync > with the code tree. Could you explain what you mean by this last sentence? Also, what affect does the SHARED=copies declaration have? Thanks, --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu "I read somewhere to learn is to Information Technology Services remember... and I've learned that Eastern Nazarene College we've all forgot..." - King's X -------------------------------------------------------------------------