From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 22 03:20:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83BA16A422 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A414C43D45 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:20:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2M3KITJ057312 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:20:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2M3KITI057311; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:20:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:20:18 GMT Message-Id: <200603220320.k2M3KITI057311@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Bruce Evans Cc: Subject: Re: bin/94810: fsck incorrectly reports 'file system marked clean' when lost+found fills up X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bruce Evans List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:20:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/94810; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce Evans To: Kris Kennaway Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/94810: fsck incorrectly reports 'file system marked clean' when lost+found fills up Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:10:03 +1100 (EST) On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Description: > > In cases of severe filesystem damage, fsck may fill up lost+found: > > [...] > SORRY. NO SPACE IN lost+found DIRECTORY > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > > > UNREF DIR I=871505 OWNER=root MODE=40770 > SIZE=512 MTIME=Jan 1 09:59 1970 > RECONNECT? yes > > SORRY. NO SPACE IN lost+found DIRECTORY > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY > [...] > > However, when fsck eventually completes it reports > > ***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN ***** > ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** > > In fact, all of the damage was not repaired since the extra files > could not be reconnected to lost+found, so it is necessary to: > > 1) mount and clean out lost+found or move it aside > > 2) unmount and rerun fsck to continue recovering lost files. > > 3) Repeat until all files have been recovered (may take multiple > iterations) Steps 2 and 3 seemed to be unnecessary when I ran fsck with -y. Then seemed to just delete everything that couldn't be reconnected to lost+found, and fsck's claim to have cleaned the file system seemed to be correct because the deletions worked. Another problem with fsck -y is that you have to use it too much because the interactive interface for answering y/n doesn't scale to large file systems with relatively small but absolutely large damage. fsck -y should only be used for disposable file systems, but even then you might want to try to preserve 2 files without interactively answering y/n up to N*2^32 times for the ones you don't care about. Bruce