From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 19 22:24:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0791CA2; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from villa.alberto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92268FC14; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id jf20so414761bkc.13 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0uIwboGC90JtcIURgExIqQ0EgQybddcJ40OOgyr6zGI=; b=PGr9vRB6wZHsuQUP40lqI0jHY5v7nNmDOo/pE98P+8MckZwijb0RbHj4FJRdWE3vNq uGjiKHUO7yK0FIDZ7UPvHWCybra0meIB1c6dVO5BYr9k8SuyVpyaPh2UCenbL4LomUEh opTdVFUeVHklCE+q6NIgdghEZHcGMaWKYlCwJ0k+nfHizmubu+U5HZsyWpHjzkjDiCaZ 1jUsw4P1QEdWLyZRJZIBAioXiTH9AO2JTMGM7v+aicBaZVTRKDM9eH93NccoHRWK/uc3 HUW5b9/Thmfyiej5NUQxSGg5KjTip/0881xs6bD2zW+t678wEy7YsudN5+o+O+DDaz4k rQFg== Received: by 10.204.129.16 with SMTP id m16mr848766bks.136.1350685496553; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: villa.alberto@gmail.com Received: by 10.205.81.1 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:24:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201210191334.38712.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20121005215316.GA38707@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <201210121006.17276.jhb@freebsd.org> <201210191334.38712.jhb@freebsd.org> From: Alberto Villa Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:24:36 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9KnMOMNW0KS2q0SctLucByfZl0g Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dell acpi_video patch To: John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock , mobile@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:24:59 -0000 On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:34 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > I considered that, but 1) it wouldn't help your laptop, and 2) the ACPI 3.0b > spec where bit 31 is added specifically states (in the Note 3 I included in > my prior e-mail) that 0x110 is the only valid legacy ID. Sure, it wasn't about my laptop, but a general consideration; also spec 5.0 lists only 0x0110, so it's better to stick to the spec as you say. By the way, I think the name of devices is not used anywhere (apart for an X.Org piece of code which I'm going to patch), so it's not important. -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla