From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 20:55:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D7E106566C for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgordeev@dir.bg) Received: from dir.bg (mail.dir.bg [194.145.63.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C9F8FC1B for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgordeev@dir.bg) Received: from [84.238.192.16] (account jgordeev@dir.bg HELO sometimes2.studgrad.net) by srv.dir.bg (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTPSA id 68224002 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:25:46 +0200 Message-ID: <49A457CA.20704@dir.bg> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:25:46 +0200 From: Jordan Gordeev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; DragonFly i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <1aa142960902241100u671d5f90u769ad98e08fabb43@mail.gmail.com> <49A447C5.2020903@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <49A447C5.2020903@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Google SoC 2009 Idea X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:55:50 -0000 Sam Leffler wrote: > Siddharth Prakash Singh wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm wrote: >> >>>> Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler. >>>> I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD. >>>> Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore >>>> Architectures. >>>> >>> Talk to jeff@freebsd.org, the author of ULE. >>> >> >> What are your opinions on this project? What is the scope of this >> project? >> >>>> Linux Kernel 2.6.* currently supports SMP, SMT, NUMA architectures. >>>> >> >> Does the current scheduler has support for "CPU affinity/binding", >> mechanism for distinguishing varying capability of CPUs. >> >>> These may be there already in ULE, although I'm not sure about NUMA. >>> >>> Ray >>> >>> >> >> Waiting for your response, >> >> > I note you sent this same note to the netbsd mailing lists. You might > want to do some more investigation before you propose a project. > > Sam > It was also sent to the DragonFly mailing lists. :-)