From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep 30 10:36:35 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA11105
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 10:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA11041;
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 10:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA06167; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 10:35:03 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199609301735.KAA06167@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: isdn code
To: phk@FreeBSD.org
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 10:35:03 -0700 (MST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <6110.844011199@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Sep 29, 96 05:33:19 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Unless sufficient many people come out in defense of the current isdn
> code in the FreeBSD tree, it will be removed because of lack of support
> from developers.

What is "unsupported" about it such that it makes you want to remove
the code?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.