From owner-freebsd-alpha Sun Oct 29 8:36: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B8637B479; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 08:36:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22937; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:36:03 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e9TGa3d75422; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:36:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:36:03 -0500 (EST) To: John Baldwin Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Testers please.. In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14844.20818.779470.967531@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org John Baldwin writes: > - I didn't actually pass the new-bus interrupt handler flags down > into alpha_platform_setup_intr(), so the MPSAFE flag would never > actually be set in the intrhand structures. > - Partly as a result of the above, I didn't enforce exclusiveness > of interrupt vectors for INTR_EXCL interrupts. What would the impact of this be on non-SMP systems, if any? > The patch at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/alpha.fast.patch > should fix all this, but I don't have a workign sio to test it on, > so I would appreciate some testing and feedback. Thanks. I'm now running it on my home miata, also w/o using sio, but it doesn't seem any less stable than it was.. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message