Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:53:15 +0100
From:      void <void@f-m.fm>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vtnet is still slow
Message-ID:  <aPjv2wIFcBGdmV2B@int21h>
In-Reply-To: <649d06b9-17d7-4d67-a2d0-bb53c76b62fe@codenetworks.net>
References:  <aPjkGDgl6MCF-unb@int21h> <649d06b9-17d7-4d67-a2d0-bb53c76b62fe@codenetworks.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Santiago Martinez wrote:
>Hi there, how does the topology looks?

iperf3 target is a desktop running stable/14. Its interface is em0
and its ip is 192.168.1.232

iperf3 bhyve guests (clients) as described in the previous email.

The baremetal server is also a 'client' in this iperf3 context but its
interface is bxe0 not vtnet0.

The network 1GB all connected via 1GB switch.

The command used on the clients was iperf3 --time 60 -c 192.168.1.232

Using your command switches in place of the one I used, I get

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-5.03   sec   254 MBytes   423 Mbits/sec    0            sender
[  5]   0.00-5.03   sec   254 MBytes   423 Mbits/sec                  receiver

from stable/14 client
-- 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aPjv2wIFcBGdmV2B>