From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 18:07:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7B3BB4 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com (mail-yh0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EE3F2A3F for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b20so261116yha.13 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:07:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9EJwuMRH9Ic6njSOta1E+IKD9uy7Gjk6Q32U79tVYwA=; b=wxlQUCytsuSe3gEyXDWkutzp6y0L+T3T5PPt/wHFCbiftuB0uvhUxOQYCIQUXNc5Rv YPqZ7zcNqKMUNZURkhiy2MJWWa7JhbQDuD1xxlQmQwVkq7h5vkECMXEQ+VkwiIrS/Zxv sQItHTkUtdD3wGPB01x4IF4WonVzbH591Vs7OrY4KI1USPW3W0EOoVSN/5HoO7jzx7/A XWt8uo/FTfHkbTwfPr0eg673ni9u7n7NGKSQMWkQpYACbVHeW2LYgGCBCc6yIP7Clv/I yzh9lq8682k9dLFKLQBEiJz8Mq9jiRBe/8gnnsEHyGmbiJV22UW30BhEuUJeAqbr/Mbw e91w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.193.42 with SMTP id j30mr106606yhn.192.1381342040710; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.39.33 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:07:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <52557FB9.9090409@cos.ru> <525585F2.2010202@o2.pl> <20131009164942.GA1397@garage.freebsd.pl> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:07:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [zfs] BSD ZFS vs. illumos ZFS From: Freddie Cash To: zfs@lists.illumos.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:07:21 -0000 On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Tim Cook wrote: > From a downside perspective I beleive FreeBSD still has no solid block > target stack. I believe SpectraLogic gave some code to the effort but it'= s > not yet fully baked? There's also no ALUA support that I'm aware of - GE= OM > only supports active/passive pathing. > > From the NAS side of things, FreeBSD has no concept of an in-kernel > licensed CIFS stack, it relies on SAMBA. The one thing I would say on th= is > front is it's likely to be less of a concern as SAMBA embraces SMB3. I > don't see any way that the in-kernel stack in illumos is getting smb3 > support unless there's work and money behind it I'm not aware of. > > I also don't believe FreeBSD has any support for nfsv4 or 4.1/pnfs. It's > admittedly been a while since I've played with running it as a server so > some or all of the above may have been addressed. I'll leave it to someo= ne > like Pawel to correct me where I'm wrong. > =E2=80=8BFreeBSD has NFSv4 client and server support. Has for awhile now. = I believe it's experimental in 8.x and default in 9.x? And Rick Maclem (hope I spelt that right) has NFSv4.1 client support available for testing in 10.x? At least, I vaguely remember a head's up about it around a month or so ago. --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com