From owner-freebsd-multimedia  Wed Apr 16 22:43:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-multimedia>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA09854
          for multimedia-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from INET-01-IMC.microsoft.com (mail1.microsoft.com [131.107.3.41])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA09846
          for <multimedia@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail1.microsoft.com with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.14)
	id <JC7P2W8B>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:42:20 -0700
Message-ID: <88CE23A0B727D0118BB000805FD4752401606328@RED-81-MSG.dns.microsoft.com>
From: Thomas Pfenning <thomaspf@microsoft.com>
To: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>,
        Randall Hopper
	 <rhh@ct.picker.com>
Cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Bt848 Missing frames fix 
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:28:15 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.14)
Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I think you are right. It manifests itself in highly visible steps on
sloped lines. However, I only see this at 24bit color depth. At 15 bit
everything looks okay.

Cheers

	Thomas

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Louis A. Mamakos [SMTP:louie@TransSys.COM]
> Sent:	Wednesday, April 16, 1997 7:45 PM
> To:	Randall Hopper
> Cc:	Amancio Hasty; multimedia@freebsd.org
> Subject:	Re: Bt848 Missing frames fix 
> 
> I've also noticed the occasional case where the system seems to lock
> up pretty tight.
> 
> In my case, it seems to be related to having fxtv's view window
> resized
> to something between the default "small" size, and full size and
> having
> a marginal input signal.  It might be related to occasional
> loss-of-sync
> sort of provocation, but its not real clear.  In my case, I don't
> recall
> still seeing live pictures on the display, but the box hasn't reset;
> I'm
> still hearing the audio through the soundcard mixer.
> 
> Also, as I've mentioned to Randall, I think that the even/odd fields
> are
> interchanged.  Someone else mentioned this before, and it seems
> noticable if you look at text and graphical objects on the tv
> broadcast.
> I recall looking at this a little while ago, and I thought that the
> way the RISC program were being built had the wrong field (even or
> odd?)
> starting off in the memory buffer.  Is it just me, or is anyone else
> noticing this?
> 
> louie
>