From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jun 25 15:56:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA15865 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:56:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from luke.cpl.net (luke.cpl.net [209.150.92.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA15654 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:54:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shawn@luke.cpl.net) Received: (from shawn@localhost) by luke.cpl.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA24126; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980625155607.03452@cpl.net> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:56:07 -0700 From: Shawn Ramsey To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ET card problem? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We just setup a FreeBSD router(second one) today. It is working fine except we'd like to fix something if possible... the "from" address of the machine is the interface of the router card, as opposed to the NIC card. Is this by design, or is there a way to change it? Here is what ifconfig -a looks like : eth0: flags=51 mtu 1500 inet 209.150.92.198 --> 209.150.92.193 netmask 0xffffff00 eth1: flags=10 mtu 1500 eth2: flags=10 mtu 1500 eth3: flags=10 mtu 1500 ed2: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 209.150.92.72 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 209.150.92.127 inet 209.203.66.17 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 209.203.66.31 ether 00:80:ad:b6:56:36 lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 tun0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 thanks.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message