From owner-freebsd-security Tue Feb 18 01:06:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA15896 for security-outgoing; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 01:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA15582; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 01:04:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA02472; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 01:04:46 -0800 (PST) To: "Julian H. Stacey" cc: security-officer@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I guess we need to read all code, not just SUID stuff ! In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Feb 1997 19:19:45 +0100." <199702171819.TAA02087@vector.jhs.no_domain> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 01:04:46 -0800 Message-ID: <2468.856256686@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > We presumably don't need to just read the SUID stuff, > we need to read all 120M of src/ :-( We need to read all 120M of src, and that project is already underway. See http://www.freebsd.org/auditors.html for the latest roster. Freefall has also been completely rebuilt and numerous measures taken. Don't think we haven't thought of all the scenarios you raised and probably a good 2 dozen you didn't. :-) There is no one more paranoid that we are at the moment, and with unfortunate good reason. Jordan