Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:51:12 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, sbruno@freebsd.org, Marius Strobl <marius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 Message-ID: <20151105195112.GG65715@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20151105043919.GB20673@lonesome.com> References: <563A5893.1030607@freebsd.org> <2AAC0EF3-528B-476F-BA9C-CDC3004465D0@bsdimp.com> <20151105043919.GB20673@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote this message on Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 22:39 -0600: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:19:38PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > There was some work to get clang to do the right thing for sparc64. > > Last I heard, the tree compiles with it. > > Our users who have tried it are not experienced enough to debug the > problems. They would have to work with a developer. A developer needs to fix the pcpu issues that I talk about in: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/2014-March/009235.html to get sparc64 using clang... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151105195112.GG65715>