From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 5 02:29:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87E61065670; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 02:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A574B8FC19; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 02:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1C8170E3; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:30:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s=aegis; t= 1309833004; bh=omts0Pd91l5YTRW2/bQKEuBmEvYlzEkRoSeNL7Pzqx4=; b=n yn4IOb+edX2S5DkP3CaPSCrfMF8HeyVtZBHYws87MU6R+9mthPqZccSuJ+S1yxtE aBUX3td0MXhEQuM9q4cX5mWcz1nYBQ6A7Xbo9AXp6lx4SvXlvin/7QKh+2lFUa+I CowolM+llrcDOu0bAqTpcJKFT88oQryXYd2w93YLIo= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id 00aFJuZlpvA8; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:30:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:29:33 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20110705022932.GD6224@magic.hamla.org> References: <201107040755.p647tS0b082384@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110704162342.GD5630@magic.hamla.org> <4E122F0C.4080000@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E122F0C.4080000@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/libotr Makefile ports/security/pidgin-otr Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sahil Tandon List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 02:29:37 -0000 On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 14:22:20 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/04/2011 09:23, Sahil Tandon wrote: > >On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 07:55:28 +0000, Doug Barton wrote: > > > >> Modified files: > >> security/libotr Makefile > >> security/pidgin-otr Makefile > >> Log: > >> Indicate my preference against bumping PORTREVISION in these ports > >> without a good reason > >> > >> Revision Changes Path > >> 1.24 +2 -0 ports/security/libotr/Makefile > >> 1.34 +2 -0 ports/security/pidgin-otr/Makefile > > > >Pardon my ignorance, but is this in response to the chasing of libgcrypt > >shlib bump or something else? > > Preventative maintenance. Is there an example of when either of these ports was bumped inappropriately? We should not be bumping PORTREVISION without good reason across *all* ports, so I want to understand why these two particular ports that you maintain are being singled out with explicit comments. -- Sahil Tandon