From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 16:37:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8115106572D for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765A08FC26 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1JjGp4-000BDn-GD; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:37:26 +0400 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <72854627@bb.ipt.ru> <200804072321.19332.aline@riseup.net> <20080408120026.582326h7ubg7rd40@webmail.leidinger.net> <51403695@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408165737.21116ohrt6c8pt44@webmail.leidinger.net> <15726112@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408172617.667132avjdqmc4ao@webmail.leidinger.net> <83563690@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408181137.20802c99svfzc9c0@webmail.leidinger.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:35:05 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20080408181137.20802c99svfzc9c0@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Tue\, 08 Apr 2008 18\:11\:37 +0200") Message-ID: <85320614@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: linux-f8 infrastructure ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:37:29 -0000 On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:11:37 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Boris Samorodov (from Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:43:49 +0400): > > Which engines you would like to see by default with f8? > The one I use? ;-) Sure! And it is... > I don't know if it should be by default or with an extra port. By > default would be more user friendly. Depends on the size maybe. We > could have a look what is installed in the native gtk2-engines > port(s). Well, I just noticed that at a time of the port's (linux-f8-gtk2) creation I've overlooked the existence of gtk2-engines-2.12.2-1.fc8.i386.rpm package... I'll fix the port. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve