From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Sat Apr 3 06:12:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C865C1083 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 06:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC66F1BDDz3FlP for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 06:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 286E25C1082; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 06:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282515C0D51 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 06:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC66F0XQ8z3FlN for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 06:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055225EF0 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 06:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1336CqqD088539 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 06:12:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1336Cq2e088538 for gnome@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 06:12:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 254024] devel/gvfs: gvfsd-trash latches to zfs volumes Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 06:12:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 06:12:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254024 --- Comment #16 from rozhuk.im@gmail.com --- (In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #14) > Please, why not kill gvfsd-trash? Because you may have many apps that do some fs monitoring. (In reply to Damjan Jovanovic from comment #15) > O_EVTONLY sounds interesting. Did Apple open source that code? I do not dig into this. Even if source code available, I suppose it is much different than we have = in our base. I try to start discussion about this @freebsd-hackers mail list 4 years ago ("open(): O_EVTONLY and O_NOATIME") but no ones care. Next attempt was try to add kernel unmount notifications to catch it in user space apps and close all descriptors in mine FAM implementation for glib20: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19690 but I do not finish it, and I do not like this design: it can not close all descriptors on first unmount attempt without some sort of sleep in kernel to wait for all processes receive and handle unmount notification. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=