From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 21 01:19:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC6C16A417; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:19:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E9A13C4D5; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:19:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id lBL2910Z043397; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:09:02 GMT (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: (from dunstan@localhost) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.13.4/8.12.9/Submit) id lBL290c4043390; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:09:00 GMT (envelope-from dunstan) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:08:58 +0000 From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" To: Hidetoshi Shimokawa Message-ID: <20071221020858.GA43238@FreeBSD.czest.pl> Mail-Followup-To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" , Hidetoshi Shimokawa , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20071219025024.GA6966@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <626eb4530712182331o38e3cdfem8899302dfb7b2e4a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <626eb4530712182331o38e3cdfem8899302dfb7b2e4a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FireWire causes hang at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:19:46 -0000 On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 04:31:00PM +0900, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote: > Oops, could you replace the line "u_int max_node;" in firewirereg.h > with "int max_node;". > This should prevent too many loops. However, I don't know why we cannot > get correct max_node value from self-id packets. I changed the structure's member type and it seems to fix my problem. Let me do some more testing though. -- Wojciech A. Koszek wkoszek@FreeBSD.org http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/