From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 22:21:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14011065672 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE90F8FC1C for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBFMKpnQ056617; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:20:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBFMKpr7056614; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:20:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:20:51 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: prad In-Reply-To: <20081215133957.4ef356ec@gom.home> Message-ID: <20081215231835.Y56482@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20081215133957.4ef356ec@gom.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: power management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:21:01 -0000 > my son read somewhere that linux does better power management than > freebsd. one specific item being that the cpu scaling is more > efficiently handled. my friend told me that freebsd does it better ;) anyway it's just "been told", "somewhere" etc. to compare things we first need to set up a metric :) > i don't know much about this stuff so i thought i'd ask here. > > 1. is there any accuracy to the statement? > > 2. is cpu scaling a kernel issue? if so, does this mean that the linux > kernel has coding in it which deals with the scaling better? IMHO it depends on hardware and ACPI. maybe linux handles strange cases better maybe not. Simply - install linux, then FreeBSD on same machine and check it :)