Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:42:04 +0900 From: Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@hadaly.org> To: hrs@jp.FreeBSD.org Cc: shige@FreeBSD.ORG, henrik.motakef@web.de, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Whats up with share/xml/catalog? Message-ID: <86it37ngpf.wl@hadaly.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20020723.125249.78733051.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> References: <86wuro2vim.wl@hadaly.dyndns.org> <87heirzjnx.fsf@pokey.henrik-motakef.de> <86k7nnnss2.wl@hadaly.dyndns.org> <20020723.125249.78733051.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:52:49 +0900 (JST), Hiroki Sato <hrs@jp.FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > fuyuki> Is there any plan to extend mkcatalog to create the XML catalogs? > > Personally yes, I am trying to add XML catalog support > into mkcatalog. Please wait until it is ready. Good news. I just wait for the release. :) > However, I wonder if ports folks agree with depending on > mkcatalog among ports that manipulate SGML/XML catalog or not. I agree that both styles of catalogs are created and most users would welcome it. IMHO, the sudden catalog format change would be a POLA violation. However, the naming scheme for catalogs can be quite controversial. I don't know what's the best, but the dedicated directory for catalogs could be an option. (ex: Debian maintains sgml catalogs in /etc/sgml.) > Mkcatalog is written only since I annoyed that updating catalog was > done in inconsistent ways in ports collection. So if anyone know > another/better tool for the purpose, please let me know. Could you tell me the rough plan of your new mkcatalog? Regards, -- fuyuki To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86it37ngpf.wl>