From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 8 16:01:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722D716A420; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE30843D6A; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:01:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k28FxOW1024826; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:59:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:59:28 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060308.085928.120042761.imp@bsdimp.com> To: pjd@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060308150647.GG737@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20060308071705.GJ62485@garage.freebsd.pl> <86ek1dwfa6.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060308150647.GG737@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:59:24 -0700 (MST) Cc: des@des.no, src-committers@freebsd.org, ume@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/regression/lib/libc/resolv Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:01:33 -0000 In message: <20060308150647.GG737@garage.freebsd.pl> Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: : On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:45:37AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: : +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: : +> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:37:11AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: : +> > > > Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: : +> > > > > Log: : +> > > > > NOMAN --> NO_MAN : +> > > > No, the correct spelling is : +> > > > MAN= : +> > Since when? I found 36 NO_MAN='s in my tree and none 'MAN='. : +> : +> Since we abandoned MAN[1-9]. The fact that many old Makefiles still : +> use NO_MAN doesn't make it right; NO_MAN is a user knob, not a : +> Makefile knob (same distinction as between WITH_FOO and USE_FOO in the : +> ports tree). : : Fair enough. Maybe we should fix NO_MAN= uses, so it doesn't create : confusion? Seems like a reasonable thing to do. Cut and paste copying of bad examples is a big source of bogusness in our tree... Warner