From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 00:33:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AF016A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:33:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay10-f25.bay10.hotmail.com [64.4.37.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAC943F85 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:33:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gb_orchid@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:33:38 -0800 Received: from 61.187.56.10 by by10fd.bay10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:33:38 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.187.56.10] X-Originating-Email: [gb_orchid@hotmail.com] From: "Shen Lily" To: doc@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:33:38 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2003 08:33:38.0351 (UTC) FILETIME=[2DBDEBF0:01C3A1E5] Subject: Why does freebsd not support it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:33:38 -0000 I read some papers that say LFS has superiority over FFS in some aspect. Why does freebsd not support it? _________________________________________________________________ Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn