From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 17:16:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF08106566C; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (palm.hoeg.nl [188.40.72.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68DE8FC30; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EB891B5D18A; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:16:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:16:48 +0100 From: Ed Schouten To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20100317171648.GD7307@hoeg.nl> References: <20100313170725.GW8200@hoeg.nl> <20100313.121932.997044077387131740.imp@bsdimp.com> <20100317085004.GB7307@hoeg.nl> <20100317.092205.1068292109300099051.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kfjH4zxOES6UT95V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100317.092205.1068292109300099051.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: unixmania@gmail.com, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, nwhitehorn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r205014 - in head: . sys/amd64/amd64 sys/amd64/conf sys/amd64/include sys/amd64/linux32 sys/compat/freebsd32 sys/compat/ia32 sys/conf sys/fs/procfs sys/ia64/conf sys/ia64/ia64 sys/ia64/... X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:16:49 -0000 --kfjH4zxOES6UT95V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * M. Warner Losh wrote: > I agree with John this is too fine grained. We don't currently have > this data for the removals, just when we did. And it isn't clear that > our users could easily find this data either, even if we > dumpster-dived the repo for it. I do think the same, but maybe in the future we should annotate compat bits like these in source by specific __FreeBSD_version? --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --kfjH4zxOES6UT95V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuhDn8ACgkQ52SDGA2eCwVhjwCdEqETz667A6khpKojLTt2CxZ+ 6e8AnR+D/zkHdD7qAaEz4JtbLcrpGUte =dyna -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kfjH4zxOES6UT95V--