From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 21 15:15:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA22920 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 15:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA22909 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 15:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA00975 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 18:13:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 18:13:40 -0400 (EDT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proper nfs /usr/src sharing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As a followup, I'm trying mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj onto a remote machine after doing a "make buildworld" on the nfs server machine. I tried the option in the /usr/src/Makefile of "make reinstall" and "make install" and they both choke on a missing /usr/src/include/rpcsvc/klm_prot.h file. It doesn't exist, so I cvsupp-ed again today, and it's still not there. And to add to my confusion, when I look in /usr/include/rpcsrv on the server machine, I see it hasn't been installed there for quite some time either: -|super-g|-$ ls -al /usr/include/rpcsvc/klm_prot. klm_prot.h klm_prot.x -|super-g|-$ ls -al /usr/include/rpcsvc/klm_prot.h -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 1844 Mar 25 09:36 /usr/include/rpcsvc/klm_prot.h -|super-g|-$ ls -al /usr/include/rpcsvc/klm_prot.x -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 3691 Mar 25 09:36 /usr/include/rpcsvc/klm_prot.x I must be on the wrong track... I would really love to just stay -stable on one machine and then nfs mount the others (about 12 at this point) and just run through the install step. Thanks, Charles On Thu, 21 Aug 1997, I wrote: > I've seen the archive answers, but they seem to conflict with each other > a bit... > > I've tried the simple ones like mount_nfs server.com:/usr/src /mnt > > But it seems kind of kludgy. Anyone have an elegant solution? > > Thanks, > > Charles >