Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:59:29 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx Message-ID: <4F3E5D41.9050503@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <1329478316415-5492205.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <4F3E289D.9050605@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E2CED.90601@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E3537.9040105@FreeBSD.org> <1329478316415-5492205.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On -10.01.-28163 14:59, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Speaking of recent libvpx update, some ports explicitly look
> for libvpx.so.0, and fail to update trying to install again libvpx
> which is already installed.
>
> e.g. multimedia/gstreamer-plugins-vp8
Yet again I'd like to point out, that -- contrary to the wide-spread
practice -- ports should not, by default, list a particular shlib major
number in LIB_DEPENDS. Only in cases, when a wrong version of some
libfoo is known to cause problems, should the correct version be
explicitly given in LIB_DEPENDS.
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3E5D41.9050503>