From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 25 00:10:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C1016A412; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C228913C459; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:10:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l0P0AGWU021877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:10:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.8/8.13.7/Submit) id l0P0AG7S021876; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:10:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Kris Kennaway Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:10:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701231143.l0NBhSRF010390@repoman.freebsd.org> <200701241847.53537@aldan> <20070124235656.GA41072@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070124235656.GA41072@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcltls hanging in self-tests? (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/tcllib Makefile) X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:10:20 -0000 On Wednesday 24 January 2007 18:56, Kris Kennaway wrote: = > I accept that, and shall wait until you find the time to collect the = > output. = > = > A semi-educated guess: the problem may have to do with the build-machine = > dropping (rather than nacking) attempts to connect to a closed port. Is = > pointyhat (mis)configured this way? = = I answered this earlier too...the build machines do not behave in this = way (you can verify yourself, they just build in a jail with randomly = assigned 127/8 address). šMaybe it's another assumption about 127.0.0.1 Maybe -- it was just a guess... There are 56 tests being run -- I need to know, which one is failing/hanging in order to investigate... -mi